02.6 Group Tectonics Study — Kingston School of Art
Skin — A Tectonics Study
Group module — a tower defined by its skin, where spaced metallic panels wrap a timber frame and let light slip between surface and structure.
A tower defined by its skin
As part of a group tectonics module, the brief was to design the structure of a tower with an emphasis on the “skin” that wraps it — given only basic dimensions. A key precedent in the design was Herzog & de Meuron’s Ricola warehouse, with its panels decorating the façade.
To set the proposal apart from that reference, the group reworked the material, aesthetic and scale entirely. Where Ricola uses concrete-like slabs, here the panels are a shiny metallic card — reading as folded sheet metal at scale. The spacing between each panel lets light enter the interior and allows the internal timber structure to be glimpsed from outside.
Ornament & aperture
Several moments operate as deliberate ornament: a large circular window on the front face, an aperture at the top floor, and an extended triple-height overhang at the lower floors. Together with the panel spacing, they give the otherwise quiet skin its rhythm and its punctuation.
i. The precedent
Starting from Ricola
The brief began with a single reference: Herzog & de Meuron’s Ricola warehouse in Mulhouse. Concrete-like panels, hung in a regular grid behind a row of vertical beams — an architecture whose entire reading lives in its skin.
The group’s task wasn’t to copy it. It was to set itself apart from it — in material, in aesthetic, in the way the skin met the structure beneath.
ii. The method
Makers, drawers, designers
The group split itself into three roles — makers, drawers, designers — each of us choosing the territory we felt best suited to. A designer would develop a concept, pass it to a drawer to be measured and resolved, and on to a maker to put into physical form. It meant the team could iterate dozens of concepts fast, systematically discarding what didn’t work and combining what did.
More personally, being part of the makers, my task was to craft maquettes to scale so we could understand what the designers had sketched. Where the design couldn’t physically work, or another approach felt better, we’d alter it.
iii. Early studies
Pattern, joint, structure
Much of the early time went into how the exterior skin could attach to the structure. I made several sketch models of timber joints — mortise & tenon, housing, lap joints — testing how panels might rest, hang or interlock with a frame.
Alongside those, the group sketched how the tower should set itself apart from Ricola, both aesthetically and constructionally.
iv. The breakthrough
Elongated horizontal beams
Ricola hangs its skin off vertical beams. We did the opposite: mounted ours to a cube-gridded frame, then extended the horizontal beams outwards so the panels could rest on top of them. The façade became light, minimal, almost layered — like overlapping tiles or scales rather than fixed slabs.
After playing around with the idea, I drew an overhang at the bottom of one of the sketch models — inspired by a different part of the Ricola building. From the same source, but reading completely differently. Ridwan picked it up and developed it into the curved canopy that ended up as the most distinctive moment of the final proposal.
v. The structural problem
Cross bracing — minimum for maximum
Later in the project our tutors flagged that the structure would need cross bracing to actually stand up. We worked through several iterations — in sketches first, then in the model — and landed on the lightest scheme we could defend: a double panel of cross bracing on the rear of the building, and a single panel on the corner of each thinner façade.
The minimum amount of bracing for the maximum support. Crucially, it sat clear of the elongated horizontal beams, so the skin-carrying logic of the structure was never disturbed.
vi. Joinery
No glue, in theory
In parallel with the structural studies, we tested ways to build without glue — traditional wood joints, wire-ties, anything that kept the tectonics honest. The wire-ties looked promising on paper but were too unstable and untidy in practice.
Regretably, the final structure was glued. At the scale of the finished piece, joinery alone would have been too finicky and slow. At a larger scale, with more time, we would have stuck more truly to the tectonics of the design.
vii. Building it
From skeleton to skin
The last weeks were spent building the final piece — the internal structure first, the skin last. The team worked shoulder-to-shoulder, with whichever roles were needed on any given day.
viii. The finished model
Skin meets structure
With the panels on, the tower reads as two systems held in balance — the spaced metallic skin in front, the timber frame just visible behind it. The cross bracing on the upper level, exposed where there’s no panel, gives the building a strong presence at its top edge.
On the lower face, the curved overhang catches the light and reads almost like a sail — the single moment where the skin departs from its grid.
ix. Details
A frame glimpsed through a skin
The most rewarding views are the ones that catch both systems at once. Looking up beneath the canopy you see the timber cross-bracing exposed against the underside of the curved skin — the engineering and the architecture coming together in a single moment.
x. Disassembly
Peeling the skin back